One-time engagement
The monitoring tells you what is broken. This is the part where it stops being broken.
Scheduled scanning finds the defects and dates them. It does not repair them, and we are deliberate about saying so: repairing a website is a change to your website, and the subscription never changes your website. Repair is separate work, quoted once, from your own scan rather than from a questionnaire. Roughly half of what we flag is mechanically repairable. The other half is usually contrast, and contrast is a decision about your brand rather than a patch.
Scoped from a live scan · one fee, paid once · last reviewed 30 July 2026
- Mechanically repairable
- ~50%Of the rules we check are fixed directly in the markup, with no design decision involved.
- The other half
- ContrastHandled as a short design pass against your palette, with your sign-off before anything changes.
- Verified against
- WCAG 2.1 AARe-scanned after the work, in a real browser, with the date the finding cleared.
- Conformance claimed
- NoneThe report records what changed and when. It never states that the result conforms to a standard.
01 — WHY REPAIR IS NOT IN THE SUBSCRIPTION
A product that edits your site on a schedule is a different risk
The monitoring works because it observes and never intervenes. It runs whether or not anyone reads it, it cannot break a page, and it needs nothing from you, your webmaster or your developer. That is the whole design, and it is why the report is worth anything: an observer with no stake in the finding.
Repair is the opposite shape. It touches markup, it needs someone to approve a colour, it has to be tested, and it can regress the next time a plugin updates. Bundling that into a monthly fee would mean either quietly editing your site without asking, or sending you a task list every month and calling it a service. We do neither. So repair is priced once, scoped from evidence, and then it ends.
02 — THE TWO HALVES OF A FINDING
One half is a patch. The other half is a decision only you can make.
Treating every WCAG failure as the same kind of work is how remediation quotes become fiction. They divide cleanly, and they divide about evenly.
- Mechanical
- A button with no accessible name, an image with no alt text, a form field with no label, a landmark that is missing, a list role that its children do not satisfy. These have one correct answer. We make the change and the next scan shows the date it cleared.
- A design decision
- Contrast. Raising a failing ratio means changing a colour, and the colour is usually your brand. We propose the smallest change that clears the threshold, show it against the real page, and wait for your sign-off. We do not repaint a practice’s identity to win a number.
- Out of scope either way
- Anything requiring a judgement about content. Whether a page’s reading order makes clinical sense, or whether a video needs a described audio track, is not a defect a scanner can settle and we will not pretend otherwise.
03 — WHAT THE ENGAGEMENT IS
Five things, delivered once, then handed over
-
A scan of the live site, on the conversion path first
Not the blog. The pages a patient actually moves through to book something — because that is where a failure costs the practice a patient, and it is where a complaint starts. You keep this document whether or not anything else proceeds.
-
The mechanical half repaired
Names, labels, alt text, landmarks, roles and focus order corrected directly in the markup, on the pages in scope, without changing how anything looks.
-
A contrast pass, proposed and signed off
Every failing pair measured, a minimal adjustment proposed against your existing palette, shown on the real page. Nothing ships until you approve the colours.
-
A re-scan, with dates
The same engine, run again after the work. Each finding carries the date it cleared, and anything that did not clear is listed as still open rather than quietly dropped.
-
A handover document
What changed, where, and why — written so whoever maintains the site next can avoid reintroducing it. Then the engagement ends.
04 — WHAT IT COSTS
One fee, paid once, scoped before anyone commits
One-time remediation
$750 – $1,500depending on page count and how much of it is contrast
The range is real, not a negotiating posture. A small site whose findings are mostly mechanical sits at the bottom of it. A large site where the brand palette fails across every button and every heading sits at the top, because that is a design pass rather than a patch. Nobody quotes before the scan exists.
- Moves it down
- Few templates, findings concentrated in markup, a palette that already clears AA.
- Moves it up
- Contrast failures in the brand colours themselves, many distinct page templates, third-party embeds you do not control.
- Not charged
- The scan that scopes it. Run it yourself, free, before you talk to anybody.
05 — WHAT THIS IS NOT
Four things this engagement will not do for you
-
It will not make your site ADA compliantCompliance is decided by a court, not by a vendor and not by a scanner. What this produces is a smaller set of defects and a dated record of when each one was fixed.
-
It will not install an overlayNot at any price, and not as an option. An overlay is a widget that claims to fix accessibility at the browser and does not. We will not ship one.
-
It will not replace a human testerAutomated rules catch a real but partial share of what disabled patients actually hit. Someone using a screen reader on your booking flow will find things no engine does.
-
It will not stay fixed on its ownA theme update or a new plugin can reintroduce any of it next month. That is what the monitoring is for, and it is why the two are priced apart.
Scope it from evidence, not from a questionnaire.
Run the scan on your own site first. It costs nothing, it names the specific elements, and it is the same document any quote would be built from.