What actually applies: the recording and interception statute
This is the statute that most often reaches a website. Session recording, chat transcripts, form-field capture and analytics that replay a visit have all been argued as interception of a communication.
- Citation
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690- Consent regime
- mixed
- Private lawsuits
- Yes. A private party can sue.
- Damages named
- Greater of actual damages, $100 a day, or $1,000, plus punitive damages and fees
- Observed filing volume
- Moderate
One-party for in-person conversations, all-party for telephonic — a split that plaintiffs have tried to extend to web sessions.
Health data law in Nevada
Consumer Health Data Privacy Law (SB 370)
- Citation
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 603A.400 et seq.- Private lawsuits
- No private right of action
- Damages named
- Up to $5,000 per violation as a deceptive trade practice, Attorney General enforcement only
Nevada's answer to Washington's MHMDA, without the private right of action.
Your state is not the only one that applies
Wiretap exposure follows the visitor, not the practice. A Nevada practice whose website is read by someone sitting in an all-party-consent state can be answering to that state's statute, not this one. Twenty states also have a comprehensive consumer privacy law in effect, and those reach your visitors from Nevada wherever your servers are.
Start with California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Indiana, or see the full list of jurisdictions.
The federal floor
HIPAA applies to a covered entity in every state. Civil money penalties were last adjusted January 28, 2026; the highest tier reaches $2,190,294 per violation with an annual cap of $2,190,294 for the same requirement.
Neighbouring states
Arizona · California · Idaho · Oregon · Utah
Sources
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press — Reporter's Recording Guide, civil suits: https://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording-sections/civil-suits/
- DarrowEverett — Tracking Pixel Litigation Expands: A State-by-State Guide to Wiretapping Risk (2026): https://darroweverett.com/pixel-litigation-trends-by-state-compliance-legal-analysis/
- Davis+Gilbert — New State Privacy Laws: Alabama, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Vermont Join the Party (2026): https://www.dglaw.com/new-state-privacy-laws-alabama-louisiana-oklahoma-and-vermont-join-the-party/
Figures last reviewed July 25, 2026.